After Wendy Stryker and Ronald Minkoff resigned from your case due to my complaint to their bosses, you were given another lawyer, the notorious “mob lawyer” Richard Ware-Levitt. Mr. Ware Levitt makes his living by trying to keep the most vicious and sadistic murderers and rapists on the streets. He is a criminal lawyer with no experience in civil litigation
It appears that Mr. Levitt was handpicked by Myron Beldock for the same reason that Stryker and Minkoff were; in order that your interests be prohibited from coming before those of Beldock.
Mr. Levitt was a perfect choice for Beldock for several reasons.
-
a)Mr. Levitt is in the SAME LAW FIRM as Beldock’s own lawyer and best friend Leon Friedman, so his allegiance is with Friedman and Beldock and not with you. This constitutes an ABSOLUTE, unethical CONFLICT OF INTEREST between your interests and those of Beldock.
-
b)Mr. Levitt allows or encourages his client to lie to authorities under oath
-
c)Mr. Levitt possesses no moral constraints, and has no compunction about defending the most heinous and dangerous criminals.
-
d)Mr. Levitt’s well known ties to the most savage organized criminals and hit men would frighten me into giving up this case.
-
e)No other lawyer would risk taking the risk of representing a person who has already lied under oath and who is so obviously involved in a criminal conspiracy.
WHO ARE MR. WARE LEVITT’S CLIENTS?
JOSEPH BONANNO
Joseph Bonanno: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Bonanno
Ware- Levitt was the personal attorney for one of the most ruthless criminals in the history of organized crime, the Godfather of the Bannono crime family.
Franscisco Rosario: torturer;
The New York City police officer who oversaw the brutal torture/sodomy of Abner Louima. Mr. Levitt either allowed or encouraged Mr. Rosario to lie to the FBI, resulting in Rosario’s being sentenced to 13 years in prison. One may ask how a NYC cop managed to pay Levitt his $600 per hour fee. Or did Levitt in order to protect the other cops and their bosses, who were actually paying him the big bucks? In other words, did Levitt send his client to 13 years in prison for lying in order to protect the interests of the people who were paying him? Sound familiar? In other words, will Levitt encourage Peyroux to lie under oath in order to protect Beldock, with the risk that she may be severely punished for perjury and worse, or will he allow her to expose the wrongdoings of his partner’s client, Myron Beldock ? He has an impossible conflict of interest.
Patty “The Pig from the Bronx” DeFillipo
Gino Galestro: Butcher Hit Man
Mr. Galestro “lured his victim to a secluded landmark...when an effort to strangle him failed he was stabbed, then dragged to a nearby pond and drowned. His body was dismembered with hacksaws and incinerated... more
Vincent “Sonny” Cassarino:
“Primo Cassarino”
Gambino soldier Primo Cassarino, whose exploits locating bugs and cameras in the ceiling of a mob social club with some inadvertent help from Gang Land were detailed here last week, got a big break the other day from Brooklyn Federal Judge Frederic Block.
Daniel Wakefield (serial rapist)
In May 1991, Wakefield was indicted in Nassau County Court for sexual assault in two separate incidents involving two separate victims. In June 1992, after a jury trial, Wakefield was convicted on two counts each of rape in the first degree in violation of N.Y. Penal Law § 130.35[1] and sodomy in the first degree in violation of N.Y. Penal Law § 130.50[1]. After exhausting his state court remedies, Wakefield filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in United States District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(1992). In his petition, Wakefield alleges that his due process rights to a fair trial and an impartial jury were violated when the state trial court allowed the jury to continue deliberating and to render a verdict after the jury reported that the foreperson had told the other jurors of a Wakefield v. McClellan
It is notable that Mr. Levitt is able to take on pro bono clients such as convicted rapists and murderers due to the patronage of his paying clients such as Madeleine Peyroux who pay him his normal fee of $600 per hour.
Ozen Thomas
Following conviction, Thomas was sentenced to 42 1/2 years in prison and Johnson was sentenced to 30 years. The men then challenged the magistrate judge's rulings under Batson before the 2nd Circuit.
Emile Dixon (on death row)
Emile Dixon was the hit-man of a drug gang called the "Patio Crew", which controlled crack cocaine sales in Flatbush, Brooklyn as well as a larger drug distribution network. Dixon was indicted by federal prosecutors on charges that included two drug-related murders in 1992 and 2000. The latter victim, Robert Thompson, was a police informant. Due to concerns over the reliability of the witnesses, the U.S. Attorney for the district recommended that the federal government not pursue the death penalty but was overruled by the recently appointed Attorney General John Ashcroft, who directed the prosecutors to ask for capital punishment in a widely criticized move.[13] On December 9, 2003, the jury convicted Dixon on 12 charges, including both murders, after a trial in which most of the evidence was provided by witnesses the defense characterized as self-interested liars and criminals.[14]
At the penalty phase, the defendant shocked the judge and prosecutors by directing his lawyers not to present any witnesses as to his upbringing, mental state, etc., limiting them to cross-examining government witnesses. Judge Dearie was troubled by this turn of events and tried to convince Dixon to reverse his decision, but ultimately conceded that Dixon "ha[d] an absolute right to sink or swim under his own flag."[15] Regardless of Dixon's strategy, however, the jury announced on December 22, 2003, that it could not reach unanimity on imposing the death sentence after only six hours of deliberations. Ironically, six of the jurors indicated that one of the factors in sparing Dixon's life was his "concern for the privacy and dignity of his family" in refusing to allow the details of his upbringing to be aired in open court.[16]
Richard O. Bertoli
Judge Lechner concluded that Bertoli had both orchestrated and directed the fraudulent LCI and Toxic [Waste] schemes, without disclosing to the public his beneficial stock ownership, in an attempt artificially to manipulate prices and profit unlawfully. Bertoli, 854 F. Supp. at 1128-30. The court also found persuasive evidence of Bertoli's involvement in the circulation, by use of the mails, of [co-defendant Richard M.] Cannistraro's misleading research report on Toxic [Waste]. Id. at 1129.
Madeleine “Madi” Peyroux
Ms. Peyroux originally faced civil claims of libel and tortuous interference with contract.
However, to cover up her civil transgressions, Ms. Peyroux has lied under oath on many occasions and spoliated evidence.. If the case proceeds, she will also be facing criminal charges of perjury and conspiracy to commit perjury, destruction of evidence and conspiracy to destroy evidence, with a total maximum sentence of over twenty years in prison. It now appears that Ms Peyroux may have been coerced into these infractions by her lawyers and manager Cynthia Herbst.
